BadDog
07-22-2006, 04:05 PM
My new Rockwell lathe has a dual belt and conical sheave varispeed drive. It originally had a somewhat cheesy (IMO) "tach" that was operated by a vertical "rack" attached to the intermediate jack shaft swing arm via. linkages and driving a spur gear with needle on the end. The needle tracked across the tach face which had dual bands, one for direct, the other for back gear.
Now, the bracket that provided the linear guides for the rack has broken out and there is no easy way to fix it. The broken part along with the rack and linkage is MIA, so I would have to disassemble the entire swing arm to remove the bracket, machine a new guide, find a way to attach it that will hold up, and recreate the missing rack itself (along with finding out it's TP, etc.). Doable without a doubt, but a lot of grungy work for a rough approximation. Seems to me it would be hard to “calibrate” as well since you would have to get the rack/pinion mesh on exactly the right tooth or be off by some 100 rpm or more.
I’ve seen in the past and found on google some relatively low cost optical input tachs that are relatively easily adapted to any spindle using light/dark alternating panels or interrupter/tone ring as a trigger. Some of the cheapest seem to have problems with low rpm resolution needing at least a few transitions a second for any accuracy. Others have arbitrary dividers so that you can have more than one light/dark transition per rotation and divide it out to get accurate readings. Lets say 4 light/dark pairs, so you divide the “count per minute” by 4 (or 8 depending on how “count” is calculated) to get rpm.
So that leads to my question.
What digital/optical (or magneto, etc?) systems have you guys seen or used that you like. What do you think about them and what did they cost? Any links to systems you have seen and like would be much appreciated as well.
Or would you go to the hassle of fixing the rough estimate gauge?
Seems the ease of implementation and vastly improved accuracy (really not needed though) make the spindle tach the obvious choice with the extra expense offset by the vastly reduced time to implement. Assuming that’s true, it’s just a matter of choosing the tach...
Now, the bracket that provided the linear guides for the rack has broken out and there is no easy way to fix it. The broken part along with the rack and linkage is MIA, so I would have to disassemble the entire swing arm to remove the bracket, machine a new guide, find a way to attach it that will hold up, and recreate the missing rack itself (along with finding out it's TP, etc.). Doable without a doubt, but a lot of grungy work for a rough approximation. Seems to me it would be hard to “calibrate” as well since you would have to get the rack/pinion mesh on exactly the right tooth or be off by some 100 rpm or more.
I’ve seen in the past and found on google some relatively low cost optical input tachs that are relatively easily adapted to any spindle using light/dark alternating panels or interrupter/tone ring as a trigger. Some of the cheapest seem to have problems with low rpm resolution needing at least a few transitions a second for any accuracy. Others have arbitrary dividers so that you can have more than one light/dark transition per rotation and divide it out to get accurate readings. Lets say 4 light/dark pairs, so you divide the “count per minute” by 4 (or 8 depending on how “count” is calculated) to get rpm.
So that leads to my question.
What digital/optical (or magneto, etc?) systems have you guys seen or used that you like. What do you think about them and what did they cost? Any links to systems you have seen and like would be much appreciated as well.
Or would you go to the hassle of fixing the rough estimate gauge?
Seems the ease of implementation and vastly improved accuracy (really not needed though) make the spindle tach the obvious choice with the extra expense offset by the vastly reduced time to implement. Assuming that’s true, it’s just a matter of choosing the tach...