sselman
01-27-2009, 04:37 PM
I'm working on specifications for a members access 'DIY' shop that will include a heavy dose of 2D and 3D CNC equipment and I could use a little feedback. Here's a quick overview of our thinking and goals.
( 3D: mill, lathe, router, stereo-lithography printer; 2D: plasma cutter, laser cutter, vinyl cutter, ebroiderer. A water jet cutter is on the wishlist, but may not be in the startup budget.:) )
1. This is the software we will make available for general use in-shop to all members. Member skills will vary from hard core guys from our local personal robotics club, to non-techie gearheads, to artists, to your next door neighbor. We need to find the best possible balance between getting newbies over that initial hump, and providing useful and valuable tools for those who already know what they are doing. We don't expect to be able to teach your amish grandmother to use it, but our goal is to reach a point where most people can do something cool or fun in 2D with a minimum of training - and simple 3D with no more than one or two classes. More than one package for a purpose is an option, and perhaps a required one, but that leads to the second concern.
2. We will be teaching whatever primary package(s) we choose, so we will need to be able to get reasonably competent with them, and be able to find and establish good relationships with those qualified to teach it.
3. A good support network and self study path for motivated users should be available.
4. Cost is a factor for us in the beginning, but it is a business expense we are willing to shoulder if its appropriate.
5. Simple cross-applicability is a plus. The shop will also have a number of other non-cnc fabrication tools. If we can ease new users into the software by doing simpler scale drawings for other projects, that could be a fairly compelling feature.
In general, I gather that SolidWorks is generally considered to be the gold standard, with Pro-Engineer a close second - but both are priced accordingly. I've seen Rhino mentioned frequently in high end hobbyist and small business circles as a decent alternative while Alibre seems to be generally disliked. I have a long standing hatred of AutoDesk, so I'd rather not deal with them unless it's very, very compelling. VCAD has come up a few times, but it's not one I've ever used, and qCAD was not a very mature project last time I saw it, but that was v1.2, and its now on 2.8. Has anyone played with it recently? An open source option is certainly attractive to a start up - but not if its not at least a solid tool.
So, to get all the way back to the beginning, what are your opinions on what would make the most compelling toolset for you guys, and for those with no background in drafting or design? Is SolidWorks good enough to merit licensing for a teaching lab? Would it be a disservice to offer training on software most people will not be able to justify purchasing. Would it be more compelling to have one or two licenses for the high end packages available for skilled users to use, and to teach a simpler ( and less expensive ) package? Have we overlooked any major packages that we should be evaluating. Do you see great gaping holes in our logic? I know we can't be everything to everyone, but we'd like to get as close as we can.
Lastly, I _am_ doing research for a commercial venture. Even so, I'm pretty sure I'm not violating the usage terms. If I am, or if this kind of post bothers anyone, please let me know and I'll refrain from them in the future.
Many thanks,
Shane
( 3D: mill, lathe, router, stereo-lithography printer; 2D: plasma cutter, laser cutter, vinyl cutter, ebroiderer. A water jet cutter is on the wishlist, but may not be in the startup budget.:) )
1. This is the software we will make available for general use in-shop to all members. Member skills will vary from hard core guys from our local personal robotics club, to non-techie gearheads, to artists, to your next door neighbor. We need to find the best possible balance between getting newbies over that initial hump, and providing useful and valuable tools for those who already know what they are doing. We don't expect to be able to teach your amish grandmother to use it, but our goal is to reach a point where most people can do something cool or fun in 2D with a minimum of training - and simple 3D with no more than one or two classes. More than one package for a purpose is an option, and perhaps a required one, but that leads to the second concern.
2. We will be teaching whatever primary package(s) we choose, so we will need to be able to get reasonably competent with them, and be able to find and establish good relationships with those qualified to teach it.
3. A good support network and self study path for motivated users should be available.
4. Cost is a factor for us in the beginning, but it is a business expense we are willing to shoulder if its appropriate.
5. Simple cross-applicability is a plus. The shop will also have a number of other non-cnc fabrication tools. If we can ease new users into the software by doing simpler scale drawings for other projects, that could be a fairly compelling feature.
In general, I gather that SolidWorks is generally considered to be the gold standard, with Pro-Engineer a close second - but both are priced accordingly. I've seen Rhino mentioned frequently in high end hobbyist and small business circles as a decent alternative while Alibre seems to be generally disliked. I have a long standing hatred of AutoDesk, so I'd rather not deal with them unless it's very, very compelling. VCAD has come up a few times, but it's not one I've ever used, and qCAD was not a very mature project last time I saw it, but that was v1.2, and its now on 2.8. Has anyone played with it recently? An open source option is certainly attractive to a start up - but not if its not at least a solid tool.
So, to get all the way back to the beginning, what are your opinions on what would make the most compelling toolset for you guys, and for those with no background in drafting or design? Is SolidWorks good enough to merit licensing for a teaching lab? Would it be a disservice to offer training on software most people will not be able to justify purchasing. Would it be more compelling to have one or two licenses for the high end packages available for skilled users to use, and to teach a simpler ( and less expensive ) package? Have we overlooked any major packages that we should be evaluating. Do you see great gaping holes in our logic? I know we can't be everything to everyone, but we'd like to get as close as we can.
Lastly, I _am_ doing research for a commercial venture. Even so, I'm pretty sure I'm not violating the usage terms. If I am, or if this kind of post bothers anyone, please let me know and I'll refrain from them in the future.
Many thanks,
Shane