Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: OSHA Releases Final Rules for Acetylene Storage Requirements

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Mount Clemens, Mi
    Posts
    2,507

    Default OSHA Releases Final Rules for Acetylene Storage Requirements

    The revised OSHA standard for acetylene took effect.

    The important or interesting part was the revision of the flow rates.

    Quote Originally Posted by OSHA
    Although the new revision only advises against transporting in automobiles, it specifically prohibits storing acetylene cylinders in confined spaces, such as unventilated cabinets, closets, and drawers.

    * While the old standard recommended a flow rate of 1/7 of the cylinder capacity regardless of the duration of use, the revision has advises a flow rate of 1/10 per hour for intermittent use and 1/15 for continuous use.
    They have a pdf down load with all the details.
    E federal register notice.

    OSHA observer Finials rules for Acetylene Nov 2009

    And for all the old farts, that were taught, to crack the valve to blow out all the contamination out of the connection. That is now a NO,NO!

    Quote Originally Posted by OSHA
    * It is recommended that acetylene cylinders valves are not opened without a regulator and flow restrictor.
    * The new standard also suggests that the CGA connection is visually examined for signs of contamination and, that all contamination is removed before it is connected to the regulator.
    7 pages of verbage but its only our tax dollars @ work
    Glen
    Been there, probably broke it, doing that!
    I am not a lawyer, and never played one on TV!
    All the usual and standard disclaimers apply. Do not try this at home, use only as directed, No warranties express or implied, for the intended use or the suggested uses, Wear safety glasses, closed course, professionals only

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Hmmmmm- - - - -I wonder if I can get somebody from OSHA to come and talk to my garden? I could save a fortune on fertilizer! I used to work with a welding school where we generated out own acetyline. The hopper on the acetyline rig held 100 pounds of carbide granules at a time, and the generator chamber was nearly 10 feet tall and 5 feet in diameter! It was in an ecclosed building just outside the oxyacetyline lab, and had very poor ventilation! About once a week, we would open the drop chamber up and flush it out with a 2" water hose. The fumes could be smelled a football field away!
    Jerry

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    513

    Default

    What's significant is the change in draw down rate. Smaller tanks will be limited to tips drawing half the acetylene we used to consider safe.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Southwestern Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PTSideshow
    And for all the old farts, that were taught, to crack the valve to blow out all the contamination out of the connection. That is now a NO,NO!
    Did they have a good reason for that or was it an uninformed decision based on lack of real world knowledge.

  5. #5
    MuellerNick Guest

    Default

    Did they have a good reason for that
    One idiot looking closely into the valve, cigarette in his mouth and opening the valve ...


    Nick

  6. #6
    gnm109 Guest

    Default

    The OSHA changes are interesting but, as usual, probably of little importance for home shop folks. My acetylene tank is in a cart, well ventilated. I seldom, if ever, use anywhere near the specified rate. I never blew the valve out anyway. I just take a look in there before I conect the regulator. The cylinders I get are always covered with a plastic cap on the threads and a metal safety cover over the entire valve. They are always as clean as a whistle, I never remove a regulator and leave the valve open.

    The whole thing is more of the usual from a top-heavy, inefficient goverment department with nothing to do except add increased burderns on manufacturing.

    I dealt with OSHA first-hand for nearly 15 years when I was a safety consultant for a large workers' compensation company. I would work with employers to correct problems both before and after they got inspected or fined by OSHA.

    I noticed that, for the most part, the OSHA people, instead of giving a good general inspection of a shop, would almost always focus on the things they knew. They come from all walks of life and some are engineers, former technicians, etc.

    If an OSHA rep knew electricals, he would only write up electrical viiolations and ignore flammable items and plumbing. If the OSHA man was formerly in construction, he would focus only on doorways, heights of ceilings and stairways and ignore electricals, fire extinguishers and the physical plant...what good is an inspection if it ignores obvious faults?

    So, it's wonderful that OSHA is out there....yawn, burp.


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Southwestern Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,724

    Default

    There was a reason that valves where cracked to blow out the dust etc. It worked, cleaning out the opening with a finger won't.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •