Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: California's over estimation of pollution levels by 340 %.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
    Posts
    1,575

    Default California's over estimation of pollution levels by 340 %.

    An interesting bit of news in this article.

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...#ixzz11iqEfuN9

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    On the Oil Coast
    Posts
    16,108

    Default

    It's agenda driven science being substituted for fact based science which has been rampant since the dawn of the environmental movement.

    Don't bother with the facts,just give us estimates that dovetail with our preconceived ideas in other words.It's gotten bad too,so bad we must now ban elements from the periodic table.

    A local Dingbat has even suggested banning Polio vaccine
    I just need one more tool,just one!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    804

    Default

    California should seced from union an become the Nanny (or ninny, both are applicable) Country.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    DeWinton, Alberta, Canada.
    Posts
    717

    Default

    Did you really think that the GW agenda was science based. GW is a religion, and as such, "solution" can rely on soft figures.

    I know there is GW, however, I do not know what is causing it. Articles like this add to my cynicism.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    52N 122W Western Kanuckistan
    Posts
    39,742

    Default California's over estimation of pollution levels by 340 %.

    A news lead like that also shows an agenda. The overestimation of pollution in question applies to only the diesel exhaust of off road construction vehicles. That amounts to nothing at all in the statewide pollution picture and simply reflects that they made a wild guess. When quantities are very small it's easy to make errors of hundreds of percent but that isn't the percentage of the entire pollution picture. The error in the total contribution to air pollution in the state is probably almost unmeasurable.

    Of course a news lead that states "California overestimates total pollution by .002%" doesn't sell a lot of papers but the other sure does mislead a lot of people.
    L&S Industries sells grinding wheels Made In USA, all types and sizes. Also Superabrasive diamond and CBN wheels, no extra cost for custom wheels, Made in Canada. 10% discount for HSM members. Call Janet 250-392-3393 08:00-12:00, 13:00-15:00 M-F Pacific Paid Ad, updated Apr 01 2013
    update 2013/3/31 . Free software for calculating bolt circles and similar: Origin now settable to bottom left! All values positive. Click Here

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    14,807

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evan
    A news lead like that also shows an agenda. The overestimation of pollution in question applies to only the diesel exhaust of off road construction vehicles. That amounts to nothing at all in the statewide pollution picture

    Don't be so sure....

    The total quantity of engines and fuel burned could be smaller, but to make up for it, those engines are worked until they about freeze up, or fall apart.... and then it's "get that thing running we need it NOW!". ONE construction machine may equal 5 or 10 normal vehicles in total pollution. Maybe many more.

    it's like garbage trucks....apparently they get no maintenance other than "get it running", either. One garbage truck equals about 15 or 20 city buses....... I basically never see black smoke from city buses, but NEARLY EVERY garbage truck puts out a mushroom cloud of dense black smoke (fine particles of carcinogenic partly burned fuel) at every start from a stoplight, or from a pickup.

    Also, watch construction equipment being started on a cold morning...... several minutes of WHITE smoke (totally unburned fuel) intermittently puffing from the exhaust is common. I have seen large clouds drifting away from the scrapers as they are fired up in the morning.

    And, of course, the garbage truck style black smoke cloud of carcinogenic particulates is just as common among construction equipment. Scrapers. dump trucks, bulldozers, backhoes (not all are diesel), but rarely from cranes........ Apparently the better maintenance of cranes extends to engines also.
    Last edited by J Tiers; 10-08-2010 at 10:36 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Bremerton Washington
    Posts
    4,672

    Default

    Oh goodie, a natter thread. Global warming is real enough for anyone smart enough to look draw conclusions from dated sat photos of the polar icecaps. A glass eye in a duck's ass can see they have shrunk over the last 40 years.

    The human activity contribution to this effect is what's up for fruless debate. I'm on the fence myself but I have to think when presented with credible chart showing armospherice CO2 increase tracking of the net global temperature. Add to this the 120 year hitory of in CO2 partial pressure increase follows fossil fuel burning in the same order of magnitue. Makes you wonder if there might be some connection.

    One thing's for sure: in any rational discussion interrupted by the witless who parrot ranters, the facts and merits of the discussion go out the window leaving behind lies and fury. Meanwhile the manipulators smirk in the background and rub their hands in glee. People are profiting from obfuscation.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    408

    Default

    By California's enlightened estimates alone the entire world should be extinct, and it is OUR FAULT! But yet somehow we are all still here. Oh and let's not forget living longer than ever before. How could that be???

    Is it possible that California is WRONG? Everything on the planet won't kill us??? Noooo....

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    52N 122W Western Kanuckistan
    Posts
    39,742

    Default

    Don't be so sure....
    You must be joking. On road vehicles traveled 340 billion miles in 2005. No matter how badly the estimated 150,000 off road diesels pollute they can't come anywhere close to the hiway and city traffic.



    And, of course, the garbage truck style black smoke cloud of carcinogenic particulates is just as common among construction equipment.
    Diesel soot is a non issue in air pollution outside of cities. It's just particulate carbon and falls to the ground in short order.
    L&S Industries sells grinding wheels Made In USA, all types and sizes. Also Superabrasive diamond and CBN wheels, no extra cost for custom wheels, Made in Canada. 10% discount for HSM members. Call Janet 250-392-3393 08:00-12:00, 13:00-15:00 M-F Pacific Paid Ad, updated Apr 01 2013
    update 2013/3/31 . Free software for calculating bolt circles and similar: Origin now settable to bottom left! All values positive. Click Here

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    14,807

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evan
    You must be joking. On road vehicles traveled 340 billion miles in 2005. No matter how badly the estimated 150,000 off road diesels pollute they can't come anywhere close to the hiway and city traffic.
    You must be joking............ Cars are so clean now, that ONE of the dirty vehicles can equal HUNDREDS of cars...... not too nice, particularly when it is right nearby.

    Not only that, but cars around cities typically drive for 20 min to a hour twice a day..... The construction equipment works all day an 8 hour day, plus overtime. Not to mention the fact that the construction equipment is typically considerably more powerful than most any car, and is working at considerable load, unlike a typical car, and consequently burns much more fuel, both proportionately and absolutely. Unless of course your car can pull a scraper.......

    Diesel soot is a non issue in air pollution outside of cities. It's just particulate carbon and falls to the ground in short order.
    U,mmmmmm that would be INSIDE CITIES, Evan.......so your comment is off target........... I live in a city, I did not drive a hundred miles to see clouds of carcinogenic soot, and billows of unburned fuel..... I see it right in the middle of residential areas as houses are replaced with new, redevelopment areas are cleared and re-shaped before building again, sewers are replaced, roads repaved, and so forth. Cities are busy with construction on a continuous basis. You may have forgotten that up on the mountain.....

    hardly a non-issue as it drifts past....... and that "particulate carbon" is anything BUT "just particulate carbon".......

    it is full of cracked fuel molecules, all sorts of heat-converted molecules similar to coal tar creosote, nasty stuff which is N. O. T. good to breathe.

    I'm not going to argue the point, we both know it;'s true, and the research is out there to prove it.
    Last edited by J Tiers; 10-08-2010 at 11:15 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •