Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: The Owen sub-machine gun

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Leesburg, GA
    Posts
    63

    Default

    The Bren was a Czech design(BR=Brno, EN =Enfield). The Germans used Czech versions in 7.92. Changing the magazine was easier when lying down and less chance of jamming the works. Correct me if I am wrong but the US did not adopt the FN-FAL because it wasn't American. The M-16 and it's variants have never quite equaled the AK as a battle rifle - ridiculous devotion?
    That being said, the Owen magazine placement was daft to say the least. The Sten/Sterling position out the side is the most logical.
    Last edited by gweloboy; 04-14-2019 at 12:39 PM.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,035

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gweloboy View Post
    .............................Correct me if I am wrong but the US did not adopt the FN-FAL because it wasn't American. The M-16 and it's variants have never quite equaled the AK as a battle rifle - ridiculous devotion? .........................l.
    While there are many examples of "we like ours better because it's ours" having fired both the M1A (semi version of the M14) and an FN-FAL I'd pick the M14. As far as the M16 never equaling the AK, in many years of High Power Rifle and Military Rifle competition I've never once seen someone show up with an AK. Have fired a couple of them and would much rather have a rifle that will let me hit the target at 300 plus yards. The one I personally owned was about a 8 MOA rifle on its good days.

    Steve

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Loveland,CO
    Posts
    252

    Default

    Spray and pray will never equal one well aimed and accurate round.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Leesburg, GA
    Posts
    63

    Default

    Shooting on a range is different to shooting other people. Most fighting takes place within 100 yards which is why the Russians developed the 7.62 x 39. Miniguns seem to suggest 'spray and pray' does have its strengths.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,137

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SteveF View Post
    I'd pick the M14. As far as the M16 never equaling the AK, in many years of High Power Rifle and Military Rifle competition I've never once seen someone show up with an AK. Have fired a couple of them and would much rather have a rifle that will let me hit the target at 300 plus yards. The one I personally owned was about a 8 MOA rifle on its good days.Steve
    Ever seen a slow motion video of an AK being fired? The barrel flops around visibly. Apparently the barrel-receiver connection or the receiver itself is structurally weak.

    RWO

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    212

    Default

    Depends.
    A variant of the AK, like the Finnish-design and Finnish-built RK62 automatic rifle, is considered the most accurate automatic battle rifle in the world.

    I personally shot 93 on first test, and 92 on second, all rounds being within the head-sized sweet spot, prone, 150 m range.
    This was with a rifle manufactured in 1967, I had never fired before, circa 1997.
    On my last routine re-training, compulsory for some special-forces personnel (aircraft mechanic, worked on Mig21bis).

    On a 300 m range all rounds would be on-target, prone.

    Wiki mentions sub moa accuracy.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RK_62
    I routinely achieved this sub-moa, in the Air Force technical school I won attendance to, circa 1987.

    Hammer forged match barrel, standard, and Finnish mechanical craftsmanship is widely seen as similar to Swiss or German or Japanese best efforts.



    Quote Originally Posted by RWO View Post
    Ever seen a slow motion video of an AK being fired? The barrel flops around visibly. Apparently the barrel-receiver connection or the receiver itself is structurally weak.

    RWO

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,035

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gweloboy View Post
    Shooting on a range is different to shooting other people. Most fighting takes place within 100 yards which is why the Russians developed the 7.62 x 39. Miniguns seem to suggest 'spray and pray' does have its strengths.
    Yes, when you are in a city. In WW2 the number the Germans and Russians came up with was 300 yards, and when in Afghanistan and the Taliban is on the next ridge it winds up being more like 500-600+. Better long range performance is why the 5.56 went from a 55gr bullet to a 62. If you watch some of those TV shows, the Taliban just sit up on a ridge, aim in the general direction of the fire base and start banging off rounds with the hope of hitting something. Once the Taliban wounds an American, our guys get pissed, figure out which rock the guy is behind and launch a laser guided missile at him. As far as the miniguns, haven't done it myself but I'd concede that hitting a man sized target firing one aimed shot at a time while riding in a moving helicopter or vehicle is pretty hard to do.

    RWO - Yeah, I've seen those videos. Pretty amazing how much it moves.

    Greystone - So, of the 100,000,000+ AK-47 and variants, there are 350,000 that are as accurate as an M16/M4. Good to know.

    Steve

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •