Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Milling math

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    303

    Default

    ANNND- it works a treat, thank you, Marv Klotz! As to a cad program, they have their uses, but I punch up calculations on my workshop computer rather than booting a cad program and wading through that. And it's been a little hobby for many years to write these BASIC programs, mostly for my own entertainment. Thanks to all who replied!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Huntsville Ala
    Posts
    5,756

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rjs44032 View Post
    Using my formula:

    360 degrees * pi/180 = radians
    360 * 0.17453293 = 6.283185307 (in radians)

    Best Regards,
    Bob
    Hmm, maybe we're speaking a different math language. Maybe my math skills have atrophied even more than I thought.

    But to me if that line 360 degrees * pi/180 = radians is to be treated as a formula, then there is an implied coefficient of 1 in front of radians. Then multiplying both sides by 180 and dividing both sides by pi it becomes 360 degrees = 180/pi radians, ... which gives us: 360 degrees = 57.29 radians (????)

    I think that's too many doggone radians.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    3,330

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mklotz View Post
    And you would have learned exactly no math that would be useful in other applications.

    Plus, had you learned some math, you could solve this problem in your head in two seconds...

    The distance from the center of a flat to the opposing vertex (dfv) is clearly the sum of the distance from the center to the vertex, the radius (r) of the circumscribed circle, plus the apothem distance to the flat which is r times the cosine of the polygon half angle [360/(2N)].

    Thus...

    dfv = r * (1 + cos[360/(2N)])

    or

    r = dfv / (1 + cos[360/(2N)])

    and the diameter is twice that.
    Did you teach math in the Redding school district in CT? Because you sound just like my math teachers


    Sent from my SM-G950U1 using Tapatalk

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    NE Ohio USA
    Posts
    51

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lynnl View Post
    Hmm, maybe we're speaking a different math language. Maybe my math skills have atrophied even more than I thought.

    But to me if that line 360 degrees * pi/180 = radians is to be treated as a formula, then there is an implied coefficient of 1 in front of radians. Then multiplying both sides by 180 and dividing both sides by pi it becomes 360 degrees = 180/pi radians, ... which gives us: 360 degrees = 57.29 radians (????)

    I think that's too many doggone radians.
    Ok. Perhaps this is better:

    Let rVal = value in radians
    Let dVal = value decimal degrees

    Then use the following equations for conversion:

    rVal = dVal(pi/180)
    dVal = rVal(180/pi)

    if dVal = 360 then rVal = 360(pi/180) = 360(0.017453293) = 6.283185307
    if rVal = 6.283185307 then dVal = 6.283185307(180/pi) = 6.283185307(57.29577951) = 360

    Hope this helps clarify. Sorry for the confusion. There was a typo in my previous response. 0.17453293 should have been 0.017453293.

    I always think in logical terms and sometimes the point gets lost in the translation. That's why I am not a Math Professor.

    Best Regards,
    Bob
    Last edited by rjs44032; 06-12-2019 at 05:19 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •