Oh and I will add, Free Hand Form Tool Grinder ..
now when you are setting stops and moving tool lengths , that is still tool setting right ?
it is just swimming and clamping that falls under Jiggle Jacking , correct ?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Possible to make a qctp "indexing?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by 754 View PostIts now Official.......
I am adding Jiggle Jacker to my resume..
or perhaps it should be Jiggle Jacker Savaant ....
include in your resume. Else you might be considered one step
up from being a fluffer.
-Doozer
Leave a comment:
-
So talking about this indexing toolpost thing and convenience that it offers,
here is my Tsugami turret lathe, copy of a Hardinge HC lathe.
I find myself using it as a general purpose lathe, pretty much for small work
on anything that does not need a tailstock. I have it tooled up, so 90% of the
time, I don't have to swap out any tooling. One nice thing, I can put small
boring bars (Like Micro 100 carbide bars) in the drill chuck, because it can
move from other than being centered. Even though I have 5 other lathes
I just can't bring myself to sell this one, because it is so handy.
---Doozer
Edit note: Notice there are two ECL dovetail toolholders with a height
adjustment feature. These make it so nice to center the tools, instead
of jiggle jacking around with the fixed height ones.Last edited by Doozer; 07-11-2020, 12:37 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Its now Official.......
I am adding Jiggle Jacker to my resume..
or perhaps it should be Jiggle Jacker Savaant ....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by J Tiers View Post
You obviously know nothing about time and motion studies.
...
The "find", is simply that your hand has to be moved (transport empty) to the location of the item, and has to be located over the item in position so it can be picked up. It makes NO difference that you know where it is, you are not "in position" to grab it until your hand is there (find). Then you grab it (acquire), and move it back (transport) to where it is to be used. The toolholder only fits one way, so it has to be "aligned" before it is put on the post, etc, etc. ...
There will be no Jiggle-Jacking around under Jerry's watch. LOLOLOL
-D
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by J Tiers View PostYou obviously know nothing about time and motion
Leave a comment:
-
I would be very surprised at a home shop that does a Taylor study (time and motion)
Had a new boss at work once who thought they were the greatest thing
He gave up after 6 months when they finally convinced him that they had already optimized their process as much as possible for decades before he was even born. With no formal study of it at all, just common sense driven by desire for profits.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by tomato coupe View PostTransport? Put it somewhere? Find? Transport back? Sounds like you're describing a disorganized person swapping truck engines, not toolholders.
Those are "elementary operations", and each is assigned a time, etc. In factory work (I know, how quaint to think that there could be such a thing as a factory) those tiny bits of work add up quickly to a lot of time and money. In the shop, it's up to the user, and few worry about it until they have to do the same operation sequence many times.
The "find", is simply that your hand has to be moved (transport empty) to the location of the item, and has to be located over the item in position so it can be picked up. It makes NO difference that you know where it is, you are not "in position" to grab it until your hand is there (find). Then you grab it (acquire), and move it back (transport) to where it is to be used. The toolholder only fits one way, so it has to be "aligned" before it is put on the post, etc, etc.
In the same way, you have a place the toolholders are set when not in use (on table next to workstation, perhaps), and you have to put the one you take off in a specific place so you can get it again. Makes NO difference that you know where that is.
Turning a toolholder that snaps into position is clearly less of these "micro-operations" per tool change. That stuff adds up when doing the same thing over and over dozens of times, or potentially hundreds of times per day. It is why turret lathes were invented. For that matter, it is why the QCTP was invented.
Last edited by J Tiers; 07-10-2020, 10:17 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
One machine I wished I had bought was a small Burgmaster turret drill , about a 18 in square foot print I am guessing. Benchtop, easy to move... would have been fun.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by J Tiers View PostYou still do not escape the fact that you have to take the first one off, transport it, put it one somewhere, find and and grab the new one, transport it back, and finally fit is on. That's still a lot of ...
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by J Tiers View Post
I have a turret and crosslide for the Logan
A small Hardinge, what a joy this machine is, quiet and has a large spindle speed range for such an old machine.
Also a big, ugly, smelly yet surprisingly quiet Warner & Swasey #5, this is a powerful machine. 20" chuck.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: