Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Russian machinists.
Collapse
X
-
You won't do that on a flimsy lathe. It's just like trying to make Knurls with a push tool. I followed that guy for a long time. Way back when he was on an old lathe in a dark corner of that factory. After he started making YT money, he started making toys and built or bought a new apartment. I kind of "forgot" to go back and look after that period. Just like another machinist we know. The videos just became play-time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Richard P Wilson View PostWriting in the 1930s, the late Fred. H. Colvin reported that roller finished cylindrical surfaces had a high grade finish, but the process produced a wavy, out of round finish with micro cracks in the surface when examined under a microscope.
So, what is the difference between roller burnishing as practiced in the 1930s, and roller burnishing 21st century style?
Comment
-
Originally posted by dian View Posti burnish to size often. i do it with the bearing race. i dont see any advantage in using the ball.
and yes, for 0.15 mm infeed you need a stout lathe.
Ball might be better in a way that contact area is smaller and it probably needs less force. Also no need to worry about bearing "shoulder" digging grooves to workpiece. (happen to me once before I rounded/polished the shoulder slightly with bit of abrasive paper)Location: Helsinki, Finland, Europe
Comment
-
This is another Russian machinist and Im fascinated how he drills at 40 seconds in the video. He doesn't even seem to bother with a pilot hole or center drill. I cannot believe how easy he makes it. I tried this with a 32mm drill in a predrilled hole the other day and my drill started spinning in my tailstock to my horror.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MichaelP View PostHe said .01mm (dia. reduction).
In his previous videos the reduction was .01-.055mm (more reduction was in stainless steel)
His goal is to increase surface hardness. In one of the older videos he demonstrated surface hardness increase from about 25% (for harder steel) to about 100-250% for softer steels. Stainless steel gained the most.
but the ball/roller method gives similar results to if the part was shot peened - with of course the lack of rough finish,,, it increases the surface hardening and also the skin density of the part itself, great for increasing durability...
Comment
-
I wonder about a down and dirty home brew that could be made with about 1/20th the effort and perhaps potentially even better results,,, instead of two ball bearings and his shield, just take a ball endmill to the business side and sink it about 3/4's deep, if you want to get fancy drill a small hole in the center then a 90 degree connecting hole for gravity oil feed, Stuff a ball into it, walla - it's going to rotate and also allow the higher unit pressure business end of the ball, and even the side forces are better off then what he's got,,, I think it might work just as good maybe even better...
EDIT; I just tried my theory out - could not get the ball to rotate it just dragged --- but my ball end mills are old HSS junk and smaller than the ball so I was side stepping to get the ball to fit in, still no luv, im thinking the piece holding the ball would have to be hardened --- and i was just using mild 1045
don't know - if anyone can make it work lmk thanksLast edited by A.K. Boomer; 08-24-2021, 03:39 PM.
Comment
-
Sorry I forgot to attach the youtube video. Have a look at 40 seconds.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by plunger View PostSome more interesting stuff. What do you think the orange material is . This is a very interesting alternative to making a gear.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qb9C7qCkbG0
Comment
Comment