Originally posted by reggie_obe
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Weird drilling conundrum
Collapse
X
-
3751 6193 2700 3517
Keep eye on ball.
Hashim Khan
If you look closely at a digital signal, you find out it is really analog......
-
Originally posted by J Tiers View PostThat whole deal of sneaking up on the size by increments of 1/64 (or even less 😶) is flawed and lousy practice.
Just do NOT put a drill down a pilot hole, UNLESS that pilot hole is just a bit bigger that (at most) the web of the following drill at the chisel end. Same size as web is good, under a little is OK, but NEVER so big it is just a little smaller than the drill itself.....
I'm gonna get all "Bented" here, and say that this is one of those things that for some reason hobbyists just love to do. There's no explaining it.... somewhere someone must have set this rule down in one of those "must-have" hobby machining references, and ever since lots of folks do it "because".
I tried it once, when I needed a tiny increase in hole size, and that was enough. The drill does everything except what you want it to do. Catches, jams, tries to screw right through on its helix, cuts off-center, cuts a three lobe hole, breaks the "corners" off the drill, whatever.
The stock begins at .42" ID., removing .030" per side with a twist drill was AWFUL at best, tough on drills and very inconsistent during the entire run.
I would not even consider trying to remove .001" per side with a twist drill, this would lead to much pulling of hair and madness.
Comment
-
Originally posted by J Tiers View PostThat whole deal of sneaking up on the size by increments of 1/64 (or even less 😶) is flawed and lousy practice.
Just do NOT put a drill down a pilot hole, UNLESS that pilot hole is just a bit bigger that (at most) the web of the following drill at the chisel end. Same size as web is good, under a little is OK, but NEVER so big it is just a little smaller than the drill itself.....
I'm gonna get all "Bented" here, and say that this is one of those things that for some reason hobbyists just love to do. There's no explaining it.... somewhere someone must have set this rule down in one of those "must-have" hobby machining references, and ever since lots of folks do it "because".
I tried it once, when I needed a tiny increase in hole size, and that was enough. The drill does everything except what you want it to do. Catches, jams, tries to screw right through on its helix, cuts off-center, cuts a three lobe hole, breaks the "corners" off the drill, whatever.
Comment
-
Originally posted by garyhlucas View Post
Sometimes you have to put a very slightly larger drill into an existing hole. If you stone the 'hook' on the flutes parallel to the axis of the drill it won't grab and you will get a nice clean hole as it kind of acts as a reamer.
They suggested both that and hitting the corners to round them a bit instead of the sharp corner.
Still got no clue about the fascination with step drilling those tiny steps.3751 6193 2700 3517
Keep eye on ball.
Hashim Khan
If you look closely at a digital signal, you find out it is really analog......
Comment
-
Step drilling has advantages at times, I dislike drilling holes with a manual tail stock as it is labor intensive and hard physical work. If a 1.5 minimum hole is required I will often start at 3/8 or 1/2".
Cranking a tail stock wheel by hand grows old quickly.
Comment
-
my experience:
1. a drill will produce a hole smaller than its tip diameter (makes sence)
2. a lousy drill or lousy setup will produce a larger hole
3. i often use a drill instead of reamer. mostly for press in situations. i have 5.95, 7.75, 9.95 etc drills for that.
4. procedure for exact reaming (short of boring) to h7 10mm: 9 mm drill. 9.5 mm drill, 9.7 mm drill (producing a very smooth 9.75 mm hole), h7 reamer
5. no idea how above would work in a lousy drill press.
6. i would never drill in 0.025 mm steps, also because i dont have such drills. they dont exist.
Comment
Comment