I see where most of the controllers for brushless rc motors are sensorless. This is suitable for airplanes because the loading and rpm ranges are within parameters that allow the controller to work well. To get decent performance at low rpms- or let's say to get a wide range of speed control with widely variable loading, these controllers don't work so well. With sensors- hall sensors usually- you have good control.
As far as the motors themselves, the larger they are the larger the bearings tend to be, and the more lifetime you could probably get with a lesser maintenance. The larger motors are also much more power capable- but that doesn't mean you have to run them that 'hot'. Some of those motors are about the size of a beer can- one such motor was rated at 15 hp. But of course it would never produce that if the power supply wasn't capable of that, so there's an automatic limit. But such a motor would also give you much higher torque at low rpms, so that alone would make it more suitable for an application where you want to be able to run at low rpms, yet still have 'guts'.
Something else in this same vein is that such motors also want more voltage in order to produce that power without the current draw becoming ludicrously high. Ten amps at 60 volts is easier to get in a power supply than 50 amps at 12 volts for instance. The main drawback to using one of these larger brushless model motors is their cost.
And that brings me around to the other idea- there's really nothing inherently wrong with using brush type motors. I've been using one on my lathe for a long time now (a treadmill motor) and have never had a problem with brush wear. There are several applications where a brush type PM motor is used in appliances, and their power ratings are in the 80 to 200 watt range. Power heads for vacuum cleaners is one- drink mixers is another one. Electric knives and paper shredders is another, but most of those use a universal motor. Those are not suitable for powering a 'micro' lathe.
What else- how about a corded electric lawn mower motor. These are similar to treadmill motors. More power than you need? Probably, but the capability of lower speed torque is there- which is something you do need.
As far as the motors themselves, the larger they are the larger the bearings tend to be, and the more lifetime you could probably get with a lesser maintenance. The larger motors are also much more power capable- but that doesn't mean you have to run them that 'hot'. Some of those motors are about the size of a beer can- one such motor was rated at 15 hp. But of course it would never produce that if the power supply wasn't capable of that, so there's an automatic limit. But such a motor would also give you much higher torque at low rpms, so that alone would make it more suitable for an application where you want to be able to run at low rpms, yet still have 'guts'.
Something else in this same vein is that such motors also want more voltage in order to produce that power without the current draw becoming ludicrously high. Ten amps at 60 volts is easier to get in a power supply than 50 amps at 12 volts for instance. The main drawback to using one of these larger brushless model motors is their cost.
And that brings me around to the other idea- there's really nothing inherently wrong with using brush type motors. I've been using one on my lathe for a long time now (a treadmill motor) and have never had a problem with brush wear. There are several applications where a brush type PM motor is used in appliances, and their power ratings are in the 80 to 200 watt range. Power heads for vacuum cleaners is one- drink mixers is another one. Electric knives and paper shredders is another, but most of those use a universal motor. Those are not suitable for powering a 'micro' lathe.
What else- how about a corded electric lawn mower motor. These are similar to treadmill motors. More power than you need? Probably, but the capability of lower speed torque is there- which is something you do need.
Comment