Well I need to do some re-thinking on the methods.
The plan was to use the presumed-to-be reasonably un-worn center V on the top of the bed for alignment. The V is more worn than I thought. Found that out when I was using the V as a reference for scraping the side. I guess I had not taken as good a look at it as I needed to.
The only thing I can do is use the two ends as reference surfaces for the side ways, since the middle area is worn to a (currently) unknown degree. The ends still have flaking on them, "real" flaking, so I can be reasonably sure they are good.
They could still be worn, since flaking is fairly deep. But I have to call something a baseline, so that is it. That adds a nuisance factor to the equation here, but it is not a deal-killer by any means.
The plan was to use the presumed-to-be reasonably un-worn center V on the top of the bed for alignment. The V is more worn than I thought. Found that out when I was using the V as a reference for scraping the side. I guess I had not taken as good a look at it as I needed to.
The only thing I can do is use the two ends as reference surfaces for the side ways, since the middle area is worn to a (currently) unknown degree. The ends still have flaking on them, "real" flaking, so I can be reasonably sure they are good.
They could still be worn, since flaking is fairly deep. But I have to call something a baseline, so that is it. That adds a nuisance factor to the equation here, but it is not a deal-killer by any means.
Comment