That unit is probably the second most useless lathe ever made. (there must be one worse). I am surprised that it got article space. Maybe desperation as far as filling an issue? Some articles in the mags have been a bit dubious in recent years.
OK, a little extreme. And, full disclosure, I HAD a 109 at one time. And, I actually did some of the same things to mine.
However, I rapidly realized the basic crappiness of the thing, and got another much better lathe (the Logan). And, I also realized the basic futility of doing anything extensive to the 109, so I moved it on to another person and avoided the "fix it" rabbithole..
I had to tell a couple potential customers that it was not what they wanted, as they explained what they wanted to do. The ultimate purchaser was not talkative, he simply inspected it, and handed over the money, so I have to assume he got what he was after.
OK, a little extreme. And, full disclosure, I HAD a 109 at one time. And, I actually did some of the same things to mine.
However, I rapidly realized the basic crappiness of the thing, and got another much better lathe (the Logan). And, I also realized the basic futility of doing anything extensive to the 109, so I moved it on to another person and avoided the "fix it" rabbithole..
I had to tell a couple potential customers that it was not what they wanted, as they explained what they wanted to do. The ultimate purchaser was not talkative, he simply inspected it, and handed over the money, so I have to assume he got what he was after.
Comment