Low profile solution
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Slitting saw arbor design
Collapse
X
-
My experience?
I have made two or three slitting saw arbors. Although I usually am big on designing on paper, I did not do any drawings for them. My construction was simpler with just two pieces: the shank with an integral flange and a cap to hold the saw on it. Oh, and a cap screw, of course. Here's how I made them.
I started with 3/4" bolts. IIRC, they were grade 5 bolts and about 4" long. A 3/4" bolt's thread has a minor diameter greater than 1/2" so it can be turned down to that size for the shank. And the head provides the metal for an integral flange. These two features allow a nice flange without the need to remove a lot of stock for the shank.
In the lathe I gripped the bolts by the head in a three jaw and center drilled the threaded end. Then installed a BB center and turned the shank of the screws down to 1/2" for the full length. I believe I finished the under side of the heads at this time as it was exposed, facing outward.
Then I turned them around and mounted them in a 1/2" collet in the lathe. Center drilled and tapped for the cap screw (1/4-20 or #10-32). I turned the OD to about 1 1/8" or 1 1/4" diameter. I faced the end and turned a short diameter to match the hole in the saw, facing the end leaving that saw hole diameter a bit shorter than the thickness of the saw. Then I undercut all of that face about 1/10" deep except for the outer 1/8", continuing the saw hole diameter into the undercut. This provides the grip on the saw at the outer diameter of the flange for greater stability.
Then a piece of 1 1/8" or 1 1/4" diameter stock (to match the flange created above) was turned to make a clamping washer with a center hole to match the selected cap screw. It also has a undercut for all except the outer 1/8". This clamping washer can be made somewhat thin and a countersunk cap screw can be used to allow the slitting saw to cut close to a feature that would otherwise interfere with it.
I do not add any wrench features. The mill and lathe spindles can be locked to allow me to tighten or loosen the screw in the arbor. This has worked for me. Or, in a pinch, the shank could be gripped in soft jaws (aluminum or oak) on my bench vise. And I make individual arbors for each slitting saw so there is no need to change them often.
That is my experience. And they work well.Paul A.
SE Texas
And if you look REAL close at an analog signal,
You will find that it has discrete steps.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Paul Alciatore View PostMy experience?
I have made two or three slitting saw arbors. Although I usually am big on designing on paper, I did not do any drawings for them. My construction was simpler with just two pieces: the shank with an integral flange and a cap to hold the saw on it. Oh, and a cap screw, of course. Here's how I made them.
I started with 3/4" bolts. IIRC, they were grade 5 bolts and about 4" long. A 3/4" bolt's thread has a minor diameter greater than 1/2" so it can be turned down to that size for the shank. And the head provides the metal for an integral flange. These two features allow a nice flange without the need to remove a lot of stock for the shank.
In the lathe I gripped the bolts by the head in a three jaw and center drilled the threaded end. Then installed a BB center and turned the shank of the screws down to 1/2" for the full length. I believe I finished the under side of the heads at this time as it was exposed, facing outward.
Then I turned them around and mounted them in a 1/2" collet in the lathe. Center drilled and tapped for the cap screw (1/4-20 or #10-32). I turned the OD to about 1 1/8" or 1 1/4" diameter. I faced the end and turned a short diameter to match the hole in the saw, facing the end leaving that saw hole diameter a bit shorter than the thickness of the saw. Then I undercut all of that face about 1/10" deep except for the outer 1/8", continuing the saw hole diameter into the undercut. This provides the grip on the saw at the outer diameter of the flange for greater stability.
Then a piece of 1 1/8" or 1 1/4" diameter stock (to match the flange created above) was turned to make a clamping washer with a center hole to match the selected cap screw. It also has a undercut for all except the outer 1/8". This clamping washer can be made somewhat thin and a countersunk cap screw can be used to allow the slitting saw to cut close to a feature that would otherwise interfere with it.
I do not add any wrench features. The mill and lathe spindles can be locked to allow me to tighten or loosen the screw in the arbor. This has worked for me. Or, in a pinch, the shank could be gripped in soft jaws (aluminum or oak) on my bench vise. And I make individual arbors for each slitting saw so there is no need to change them often.
That is my experience. And they work well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Doozer View PostHow about you use terms like LIVE CENTER or like DEAD CENTER ? ? ?
Why change tradition after like 200 years !~!~!
Sorry for being such a CROTCH CENTER.
-D
Probably were not any rotating T/S centers 200 years ago.CNC machines only go through the motions.
Ideas expressed may be mine, or from anyone else in the universe.
Not responsible for clerical errors. Or those made by lay people either.
Number formats and units may be chosen at random depending on what day it is.
I reserve the right to use a number system with any integer base without prior notice.
Generalizations are understood to be "often" true, but not true in every case.
Comment
-
Thank you guys for your help. I have learned a few things from you. I have also watched all 3 YouTube videos from Stefan Gotteswinter (thanks Dennis). What's interesting is my two small arbors were almost identical copy of Stefan's design and I did not watch these videos before. I like Stefan's videos a lot and have a great respect for him. He goes into small details of each project and does not hide important information.
So my bigger arbors would be of a similar design and I will use wrench flats. But my caps would not have a threaded end. Instead I will use a single socket head cap screw, This will make the arbor simpler and stronger. There will be no keys on these arbors.
Comment
-
Yes, Ball Bearing or LIVE center.
I like using my ball bearing or live center, but I guess any center would do.
Originally posted by DrMike View Post"BB" = ball bearing.
In other words, a live center.Paul A.
SE Texas
And if you look REAL close at an analog signal,
You will find that it has discrete steps.
Comment
-
My apologies to 200 years of machinists.
In my defense, the term "ball bearing center" does return a lot of search results:
So I am not the only one to use it.
Have they really been around for 200 years? 1820s?? I don't know so I'm just asking. An internet search revealed no results on this. Do you have any references?
Originally posted by Doozer View PostHow about you use terms like LIVE CENTER or like DEAD CENTER ? ? ?
Why change tradition after like 200 years !~!~!
Sorry for being such a CROTCH CENTER.
-DPaul A.
SE Texas
And if you look REAL close at an analog signal,
You will find that it has discrete steps.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mikey553 View Post.....What's interesting is my two small arbors were almost identical copy of Stefan's design and I did not watch these videos before........
Chilliwack BC, Canada
Comment
-
Originally posted by Paul Alciatore View PostMy apologies to 200 years of machinists.
In my defense, the term "ball bearing center" does return a lot of search results:
So I am not the only one to use it.
Have they really been around for 200 years? 1820s?? I don't know so I'm just asking. An internet search revealed no results on this. Do you have any references?
CNC machines only go through the motions.
Ideas expressed may be mine, or from anyone else in the universe.
Not responsible for clerical errors. Or those made by lay people either.
Number formats and units may be chosen at random depending on what day it is.
I reserve the right to use a number system with any integer base without prior notice.
Generalizations are understood to be "often" true, but not true in every case.
Comment
Comment