I'm just finishing up a second batch of those steel horseshoe magnets for the vintage guitar pickups, and I'm wondering about the optimum surface finish I can present to the plater. In a conversation with the plating outfit, I came away without the answer I'd hoped for.
It went like this: "Polish them the way you did in the first batch - it was fine." Then a little while later they said that they were so rust damaged in the flood (the plater is in Nashville) that they really didn't know how they looked when they arrived - they were submerged for weeks. That leaves me still wondering how scratch-free they really need them. My first ones were highly polished, and I'm thinking that I'd rather not go quite that far unless it's reasonable.
Mine had a high reflective shine, which dulled back on heat treatment, of course, before I sent them off.
I'm hoping that, say, a really clean 400 grit belt sanding job would allow them to fill with copper, nickel, or whatever is in the process. . .
It went like this: "Polish them the way you did in the first batch - it was fine." Then a little while later they said that they were so rust damaged in the flood (the plater is in Nashville) that they really didn't know how they looked when they arrived - they were submerged for weeks. That leaves me still wondering how scratch-free they really need them. My first ones were highly polished, and I'm thinking that I'd rather not go quite that far unless it's reasonable.
Mine had a high reflective shine, which dulled back on heat treatment, of course, before I sent them off.
I'm hoping that, say, a really clean 400 grit belt sanding job would allow them to fill with copper, nickel, or whatever is in the process. . .
Comment