Hi Guys,
With the first two sentences, I am making an effort to reduce the need for some individuals to bring to question my abilities or sanity. I freely admit that the following may be a stupid question thus, with that being said, let's move on to the question at hand.
I have a Bison Set-Tru 6-jaw chuck and a Bison Set-Tru 5C collet chuck. Attempting to dial in either, using manufacturer's instructions, is time consuming, hence, a pain in the butt. It's my understanding that when changing sizes of stock material, it's necessary to redial-in either otherwise neither will run true. It's also my understanding that once a piece of stock is dialed-in, it can be removed from the chuck and returned to the chuck without the need for dialing in provided that stock size does not change.
Manufacturers provide instructions for a reason. Sometimes I happen upon a method that seemingly circumvents manufacturer's instructions and I wonder *why* instructions were made so difficult. A case in point follows.
To dial in either of the above mentioned, one needs to *slightly* loosen the bolts that hold the chuck to the back plate and use 4 unevenly spaced set-screws to dial in the work piece. When finally dialed in, the bolts holding the chuck to the back plate are tightened. Attempting to utilize the 4 unevenly spaced set-screws is time intensive and a pain in the butt. Still, that is the suggested method for dialing in the work material.
Rather than using this awkward, hit-and-miss time consuming method, as of late I have chosen to freely loosen the 4 set-screws and slightly loosen the bolts holding the chuck to the back plate. When the dial indicator is in place, and bolts holding the chuck to the back plate are ever-so-slightly-loosened, the chuck can be lightly tapped, turned and tapped again until the work piece is quickly dialed in. Chuck bolts are secured and the dial indicator utilized a final time to insure that nothing has moved. With the bolts that hold the chuck to the back plate firmly secured, I tighten the 4 unevenly spaced set-screws and indicate one last time.
This is such a quick, easy method. In fact, it's so easy and quick that it causes me to question if my method is seriously flawed.
Why is this alternate method not preferred or suggested by the manufacturer? Why would my method be considered wrong and what problems would this alternate method pose?
Harold
With the first two sentences, I am making an effort to reduce the need for some individuals to bring to question my abilities or sanity. I freely admit that the following may be a stupid question thus, with that being said, let's move on to the question at hand.
I have a Bison Set-Tru 6-jaw chuck and a Bison Set-Tru 5C collet chuck. Attempting to dial in either, using manufacturer's instructions, is time consuming, hence, a pain in the butt. It's my understanding that when changing sizes of stock material, it's necessary to redial-in either otherwise neither will run true. It's also my understanding that once a piece of stock is dialed-in, it can be removed from the chuck and returned to the chuck without the need for dialing in provided that stock size does not change.
Manufacturers provide instructions for a reason. Sometimes I happen upon a method that seemingly circumvents manufacturer's instructions and I wonder *why* instructions were made so difficult. A case in point follows.
To dial in either of the above mentioned, one needs to *slightly* loosen the bolts that hold the chuck to the back plate and use 4 unevenly spaced set-screws to dial in the work piece. When finally dialed in, the bolts holding the chuck to the back plate are tightened. Attempting to utilize the 4 unevenly spaced set-screws is time intensive and a pain in the butt. Still, that is the suggested method for dialing in the work material.
Rather than using this awkward, hit-and-miss time consuming method, as of late I have chosen to freely loosen the 4 set-screws and slightly loosen the bolts holding the chuck to the back plate. When the dial indicator is in place, and bolts holding the chuck to the back plate are ever-so-slightly-loosened, the chuck can be lightly tapped, turned and tapped again until the work piece is quickly dialed in. Chuck bolts are secured and the dial indicator utilized a final time to insure that nothing has moved. With the bolts that hold the chuck to the back plate firmly secured, I tighten the 4 unevenly spaced set-screws and indicate one last time.
This is such a quick, easy method. In fact, it's so easy and quick that it causes me to question if my method is seriously flawed.
Why is this alternate method not preferred or suggested by the manufacturer? Why would my method be considered wrong and what problems would this alternate method pose?
Harold
Comment