If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
That is very interesting! Wonder if they plan to talk to Benediction as well?
No matter, what is done is done. I've changed my online name(s) across the 'net and "rebranded" my operation. I had a backup name picked out just in case someone objected. Planning ahead and all that.
Seems they didn’t have any objection, to ripping the name off from somebody else.
If the band’s name—which was taken from Benediction’s album of the same name—didn’t tip you off, their riffs surely will
That quote was from their very own MySpace blog. So its O.K for them to rip it off, but when you have come up with it via original thinking, and relevance to your work, that's not O.K. The worlds ****ed I tell you.
So- this band named themselves Grind Bastard? I had to chuckle when I read the part about 'image'. We all know you're an old grind bastard since you've said so with that name. I suppose the band wanted to create an image of themselves as bastards. Bastards who grind. I guess it's a hip movement- and there they go, ripping off ol Elvis himsef.
I'm not surprised, just mildly amused. That's pretty tame when you compare it to the Lick Dickers (hmm, I wonder what image that was designed to evoke) or the Motherph------. There are some pretty strange names out there for bands- no doubt all designed to say something about the members- ha ha. Some peculiar name choices for businesses as well-
It's also often overlooked that, if you really do hold the copyright, you must defend the copyright every time you see a violation. If you don't, you functionally lose the copyright. Sort of like squatter's rights.
Does that make me a big fan of Budweiser bullying little old ladies running little old flower shops? No it does not. But I understand why they do it.
I have no legal training but you might give this a thought. About 25 years ago a friend of mine owned a hamburger joint in Memphis. He called it Studebakers. A couple of years later, some lawyers approached him. It seems a new chain named Studebakers wanted to start a restaurant in Memphis. Apparently they couldn't legally force him to change his name and two restaurants of the same name might cause branding problems for the larger company. The larger company paid him a sizable chunk of dough to change his restaurant's name. If you haven't already, trademark that name. If you own the Trademark, they might have to offer you a similar financial incentive to change your name. Within reason, it ought to be you choice what you name your business.
Most knifemakers that I know use their name and location etched into the blade. I simply chose customcutter as a nickname for the internet, it is/was never used on my knives.
"Trademark owners do not acquire the exclusive ownership of words. They only obtain the right to use the mark in commerce and to prevent competitors in the same line of goods or services from using a confusingly similar mark. The same word can therefore be trademarked by different producers to label different kinds of goods. Examples are Delta Airlines and Delta Faucets."
"Non-competing or Non-confusing Use
Trademark rights only protect the particular type of goods and services that the mark owner is selling under the trademark. Some rights to expansion into related product lines have been recognized, but generally, if you are selling goods or services that do not remotely compete with those of the mark owner, this is generally strong evidence that consumers would not be confused and that no infringement exists. This defense may not exist if the mark is a famous one, however. In dilution cases, confusion is not the standard, so use on any type of good or service might cause infringement by dilution of a famous mark."
I think it largely depends on who can,or is willing, to pay for the lawyers.
I remember a case years ago, of a lady who owned a small, local flower shop, and was forced by Anheuser Busch to stop using the line "This bud's for you!" along with a picture of an extended hand holding a rose bud. I though it was a silly case of overkill (bullying actually) of Anheuser Busch.
But what I got from Grind Hard's comments was that the issue was the coarse nature of the name "bastard," rather than an infringement.
Was there any discussion as to who had the name the longest? I did a name search when I named my business- if you happened to have had the name longer I would think you would have had the rights to it, although given the two different (apples and oranges) usages of the same name I would not think that there would be a conflict anyway. Nice of you to offer to change yours in any case.
The two fellows came to me, stated their case in my "office." They were very nice and polite and asked if I would be willing to change my name. I asked if I could use the name seeming that I sell a product and they make music... they said they didn't want to associate with a brand of knives and if they got in trouble someway somehow it might affect my "image" as well.
So, I agreed not to advertise under the name GB and change my internet names.
Not a big deal to me, and besides they were polite and made a compelling case. No threats, no lawyers, just please-and-thank-you.
Was there any discussion as to who had the name the longest? I did a name search when I named my business- if you happened to have had the name longer I would think you would have had the rights to it, although given the two different (apples and oranges) usages of the same name I would not think that there would be a conflict anyway. Nice of you to offer to change yours in any case.
"Trademark owners do not acquire the exclusive ownership of words. They only obtain the right to use the mark in commerce and to prevent competitors in the same line of goods or services from using a confusingly similar mark. The same word can therefore be trademarked by different producers to label different kinds of goods. Examples are Delta Airlines and Delta Faucets."
"Non-competing or Non-confusing Use
Trademark rights only protect the particular type of goods and services that the mark owner is selling under the trademark. Some rights to expansion into related product lines have been recognized, but generally, if you are selling goods or services that do not remotely compete with those of the mark owner, this is generally strong evidence that consumers would not be confused and that no infringement exists. This defense may not exist if the mark is a famous one, however. In dilution cases, confusion is not the standard, so use on any type of good or service might cause infringement by dilution of a famous mark."
Was there any discussion as to who had the name the longest? I did a name search when I named my business- if you happened to have had the name longer I would think you would have had the rights to it, although given the two different (apples and oranges) usages of the same name I would not think that there would be a conflict anyway. Nice of you to offer to change yours in any case.
Leave a comment: