In the Jan-Feb, 1997 issue of HSM D.E.Johnson published an article 'A 5C Collet Adapter' for the lathe. His design addressed the matter of insufficient spindle bore diameter for a drawbar with internal threads to engage directly the collet threads. He had a separate connector mounted in his assembly that engaged the collet, then the drawbar engaged that connector.
I made the 5C chuck designed by Pat Loop, which is more like the Bison. In this design the collets are pulled in by a closure nut that is sandwiched between the backplate and the collet adapter, with a circular groove on each side containing a row of bearing balls. It functions really well, but I got a little sloppy in a couple of critical places. As a result it has about .003 TIR. I've not been able to determine if that's due to slop in the registry between the backplate and spindle nose, or the hole for the collet itself, or a combination of the two. I've thought of boring the hole out and pressing in an undersize sleeve and then reboring for the collet adapter hole. At any rate this design does permit use of long stock extending back thru the spindle bore, which D.E.Johnson's does not.
P.S. I'd welcome any suggestions as to how best to go about reducing the runout I have in my chuck. It's very useful as is, but it would be awfully nice to have better repeatability.
("... awfully nice.." I guess that's one of those oxymorons isn't it)
[This message has been edited by lynnl (edited 05-10-2002).]
[This message has been edited by lynnl (edited 05-10-2002).]
I made the 5C chuck designed by Pat Loop, which is more like the Bison. In this design the collets are pulled in by a closure nut that is sandwiched between the backplate and the collet adapter, with a circular groove on each side containing a row of bearing balls. It functions really well, but I got a little sloppy in a couple of critical places. As a result it has about .003 TIR. I've not been able to determine if that's due to slop in the registry between the backplate and spindle nose, or the hole for the collet itself, or a combination of the two. I've thought of boring the hole out and pressing in an undersize sleeve and then reboring for the collet adapter hole. At any rate this design does permit use of long stock extending back thru the spindle bore, which D.E.Johnson's does not.
P.S. I'd welcome any suggestions as to how best to go about reducing the runout I have in my chuck. It's very useful as is, but it would be awfully nice to have better repeatability.
("... awfully nice.." I guess that's one of those oxymorons isn't it)
[This message has been edited by lynnl (edited 05-10-2002).]
[This message has been edited by lynnl (edited 05-10-2002).]
Comment